Articles citing this article

The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).

Cited article:

Evaluating methods for measuring in‐river bathymetry: Remote sensing green LIDAR provides high‐resolution channel bed topography limited by water penetration capability

Leif Kastdalen, Morten Stickler, Christian Malmquist and Jan Heggenes
River Research and Applications 40 (4) 467 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.4245

A study of the hydraulic parameters and ecological significance of braided rivers under flow variations

Hao Wang, Hong Li, Lihua You, Zaixiang Zhu, Yong Li and Yun Lu
River Research and Applications 38 (6) 1080 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3991

Use of radiotelemetry to quantify diel habitat preferences and minimum environmental flow requirements of a tropical riverine fish (Sooty grunter Hephaestus fuliginosus)

David A. Crook, Krystle Keller, Brendan J. Adair, Osmar J. Luiz, Peter S. Waugh, Julia Schult, Peter L. Dostine, Simon A. Townsend and Alison J. King
Ecohydrology 14 (5) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.2290

Flow and spawning habitat relationships for Dolly Varden: Understanding habitat–population dynamics in the Canadian Western Arctic

Neil J. Mochnacz, Haitham K. Ghamry, Eva C. Enders, Douglas A. Watkinson, Colin P. Gallagher and James D. Reist
River Research and Applications 36 (1) 68 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3547

Update to the Toe‐Width Methodology: Determining Preferred Discharges for Spawning and Rearing Salmonids

James M. Pacheco and Jonathan H. Kohr
North American Journal of Fisheries Management 38 (6) 1404 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1002/nafm.10243

Application of lithotopo units for automatic classification of rivers: Concept, development and validation

J. Horacio, D.R. Montgomery, A. Ollero, A. Ibisate and A. Pérez-Alberti
Ecological Indicators 84 459 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.08.043

Selecting Between One-Dimensional and Two-Dimensional Hydrodynamic Models for Ecohydraulic Analysis

S. A. Gibson and G. B. Pasternack
River Research and Applications 32 (6) 1365 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.2972

Evaluating Uncertainty in Physical Habitat Modelling in a High‐Gradient Mountain Stream

D. Turner, M. J. Bradford, J. G. Venditti and R. M. Peterman
River Research and Applications 32 (5) 1106 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.2915

Developing Bioenergetic‐Based Habitat Suitability Curves for Instream Flow Models

Jordan Rosenfeld, Hal Beecher and Ron Ptolemy
North American Journal of Fisheries Management 36 (5) 1205 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1080/02755947.2016.1198285

PREDICTING HABITAT RESPONSE TO FLOW USING GENERALIZED HABITAT MODELS FOR TROUT IN ROCKY MOUNTAIN STREAMS

T. K. Wilding, B. Bledsoe, N. L. Poff and J. Sanderson
River Research and Applications 30 (7) 805 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.2678

BOOTSTRAP SAMPLING IS WITH REPLACEMENT: A COMMENT ON AYLLÓN ET AL. (2011)

J. G. Williams
River Research and Applications 29 (3) 399 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.1605

THE INFLUENCE OF VARIABLE HABITAT SUITABILITY CRITERIA ON PHABSIM HABITAT INDEX RESULTS

D. Ayllón, A. Almodóvar, G.G. Nicola and B. Elvira
River Research and Applications 28 (8) 1179 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.1496

Lost in space, the sequel: spatial sampling issues with 1‐D PHABSIM

John G. Williams
River Research and Applications 26 (3) 341 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.1258

Editorial: applications of MesoHABSIM using fish community targets

Richard A. Jacobson
River Research and Applications 24 (4) 434 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.1067

Comparison of MesoHABSIM with two microhabitat models (PHABSIM and HARPHA)

P. Parasiewicz and J. D. Walker
River Research and Applications 23 (8) 904 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.1043