Table 4
Formed groups based on a priori sampling design using data set of station 1 and 2, with indication each group similarity (%) and the most representative species (%) contributing for the similarity within each group, determined with SIMPER analysis.
Groupes formés sur la base d’un plan d’échantillonnage a priori utilisant l’ensemble de données des stations 1 et 2, avec indication de la similitude de chaque groupe (%) et des espèces les plus représentatives (%) contribuant à la similitude au sein de chaque groupe, déterminée par une analyse SIMPER.
| Group | Main species | % contribution |
|---|---|---|
| Spring sampling period Average similarity 84% |
Cirratulus cirratus Solen dactylus Hediste diversicolor |
21.38 30.76 18.76 |
| Summer sampling period Average similarity 63.2% |
Cirratulus cirratus Solen dactylus Hediste diversicolor |
6.55 8.72 10.91 |
| Autumn sampling period Average similarity 82.76% |
Cirratulus cirratus Solen dactylus Hediste diversicolor |
12.65 6.55 15.05 |
| Winter sampling period Average similarity 88.24% |
Cirratulus cirratus Solen dactylus Hediste diversicolor |
15.27 15.71 16.58 |
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.