Open Access
Issue
Hydroécol. Appl.
Volume 24, 2024
Article Number 1
Number of page(s) 24
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/hydro/2024001
Published online 19 March 2024
  • Baetens J.M., Van Nieuland S., Pauwels I.S., De Baets B., Mouton A.M. & Goethals P.L.M., 2013. An individual-based model for the migration of pike (Esox lucius) in the river Yser, Belgium. Ecol Modell 258: 40–52. [Google Scholar]
  • Baktoft H., Aarestrup K., Berg S., Boel M., Jacobsen L., Jepsen N., Koed A., Svendsen J.C. & Skov C., 2012. Seasonal and diel effects on the activity of northern pike studied by high-resolution positional telemetry. Ecol Freshw Fish 21 (3): 386–394. [Google Scholar]
  • Beaumont W., Hodder K., Masters J., Scott L. & Welton J., 2005. Activity patterns in pike (Esox lucius), as determined by motion-sensing telemetry. Aquat Telemetry: Adv Appl. Rome: FAO/COISPA: 231–243. [Google Scholar]
  • Blanchard J.R., Santos R.O. & Rehage J.S., 2021. Sociability interacts with temporal environmental variation to spatially structure metapopulations: a fish dispersal simulation in an ephemeral landscape. Ecol Modell 443: 109458. [Google Scholar]
  • Brosse S., 1999. Habitat, dynamique spatiale et structure des communautés pisciaires en milieu lacustre − Etude de la retenue de Pareloup (Aveyron, France). 203 pp. [Google Scholar]
  • Carmignani J.R. & Roy A.H., 2017. Ecological impacts of winter water level drawdowns on lake littoral zones: a review. Aquat Sci 79 (4): 803–824. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Casselman J. & Lewis C.A., 1996. Habitat requirements of northern pike (Esox lucius). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 53: 161–174. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chapman C. & Mackay W., 1984. Direct observation of habitat utilization by Northern Pike. Copeia 1984: 255. [Google Scholar]
  • Chapman C. & Mackay W.C., 1984. Versatility in habitat use by a top aquatic predator, Esox lucius L. J Fish Biol 25: 109–115. [Google Scholar]
  • Clark M., Rose K., Chandler J., Richter T., Orth D. & Winkle W., 1998. Simulating smallmouth bass reproductive success in reservoirs. Environ Biol Fishes 51: 161–174. [Google Scholar]
  • Clark M.E., Rose K.A., Chandler J.A., Richter T.J., Orth D.J. & Van Winkle W., 2008. Water-level fluctuation effects on centrarchid reproductive success in reservoirs: a modeling analysis. North Am J Fish Manag 28 (4): 1138–1156. [Google Scholar]
  • Cook M.F. & Bergersen E.P., 1988. Movements, habitat selection, and activity periods of Northern Pike in Eleven Mile Reservoir, Colorado. Trans Am Fish Soc 117 (5): 495–502. [Google Scholar]
  • Cott P.A., Sibley P.K., Somers W.M., Lilly M.R. & Gordon A.M., 2008. A review of water level fluctuations on aquatic biota with an emphasis on fishes in ice-covered lakes. J Am Water Resour Assoc 44 (2): 343–359. [Google Scholar]
  • Craig J., 1996. Pike: Biology and Exploitation. Springer Netherlands. [Google Scholar]
  • Craig J., 2000. Percid Fishes: Systematics, Ecology and Exploitation. Wiley, 370 pp. [Google Scholar]
  • Craig J.F., 1987. The Biology of Perch and Related Fish. London: Croom Helm. [Google Scholar]
  • Craig J.F., 2008. A Short Review of Pike Ecology. Hydrobiologia 601 (1): 5–16. [Google Scholar]
  • Crane D.P., Miller L.M., Diana J.S., Casselman J.M., Farrell J.M., Kapuscinski K.L. & Nohner J.K., 2015. Muskellunge and northern pike ecology and management: important issues and research needs. Fisheries 40 (6): 258–267. [Google Scholar]
  • de Moraes K.R., Souza A.T., Muška M., Hladík M., Čtvrtlíková M., Draštík V., Kolařík T., Kučerová A., Krolová M., Sajdlová Z., Šmejkal M. & Kubečka J., 2023. Artificial floating islands: a promising tool to support juvenile fish in lacustrine systems. Hydrobiologia 850 (9): 1969–1984. [Google Scholar]
  • Dumoulin N., 2007. SimAquaLife: a framework for aquatic organisms spatial dynamics modelling. Revue des Sciences et Technologies de l’Information − Série TSI : Technique et Science Informatiques, 26 (6): 701–721. [Google Scholar]
  • Eklöv P., 1992. Group foraging versus solitary foraging efficiency in piscivorous predators: the perch, Perca fluviatilis, and pike, Esox lucius, patterns. Anim Behav 44: 313–326. [Google Scholar]
  • Evtimova V. & Donohue I., 2014. Quantifying ecological responses to amplified water level fluctuations in standing waters: an experimental approach. J Appl Ecol 51. [Google Scholar]
  • Farò D., Zolezzi G. & Wolter C., 2021. How much habitat does a river need? A spatially-explicit population dynamics model to assess ratios of ontogenetical habitat needs. J Environ Manag 286: 112100. [Google Scholar]
  • Gasith A. & Gafny S., 1998. Importance of physical structures in lakes: the case of lake kinneret and general implications. In: The Structuring Role of Submerged Macrophytes in Lakes (E. Jeppesen, M. Søndergaard, M. Søndergaard, K. Christoffersen Eds.) pp. 331–338. [Google Scholar]
  • Grimm V., Berger U., Bastiansen F., Eliassen S., Ginot V., Giske J., Goss-Custard J., Grand T., Heinz S.K., Huse G., Huth A., Jepsen J.U., Jørgensen C., Mooij W.M., Müller B., Pe’er G., Piou C., Railsback S.F., Robbins A.M., Robbins M.M., Rossmanith E., Rüger N., Strand E., Souissi S., Stillman R.A., Vabø R., Visser U. & DeAngelis D.L., 2006. A standard protocol for describing individual-based and agent-based models. Ecol Modell 198 (1): 115–126. [Google Scholar]
  • Grimm V., Berger U., DeAngelis D.L., Polhill J.G., Giske J. & Railsback S.F., 2010. The ODD protocol: a review and first update. Ecol Modell 221 (23): 2760–2768. [Google Scholar]
  • Grimm V., Railsback S.F., Vincenot C.E., Berger U., Gallagher C., DeAngelis D.L., Edmonds B., Ge J., Giske J., Groeneveld J., uuml, rgen, Johnston A.S.A., Milles A., Nabe-Nielsen J., Polhill J.G., Radchuk V., Rohw, auml, der M.-S., Stillman R.A., Thiele J. C., Ayll, oacute D. n., 2020. The ODD protocol for describing agent-based and other simulation models: a second update to improve clarity, replication, and structural realism. J Artif Soc Soc Simul 23 (2): 7. [Google Scholar]
  • Guillerault N., Loot G., Blanchet S., Millet P., Musseau C., Cucherousset J. & Santoul F., 2021. Efficiency of Northern pike (Esox lucius) stocking in metropolitan France at large spatial and temporal scales. Fish Manag Ecol 28 (5): 486–495. [Google Scholar]
  • Halleraker J.H., van de Bund F W., Bussettini M., Gosling R., Döbbelt-Grüne S., Hensman J., Kling J., Koller-Kreimel V. & Pollard P., 2016. Working group ECOSTAT report on common understanding of using mitigation measures for reaching good ecological potential for heavily modified water bodies. 104. [Google Scholar]
  • Hayes D., Jones M., Lester N., Chu C., Doka S., Netto J., Stockwell J., Thompson B., Minns C., Shuter B. & Collins N., 2009. Linking fish population dynamics to habitat conditions: insights from the application of a process-oriented approach to several Great Lakes species. Rev Fish Biol Fish 19 (3): 295–312. [Google Scholar]
  • Hirsch P.E., Eloranta A.P., Amundsen P.-A., Brabrand Å., Charmasson J., Helland I.P., Power M., Sánchez-Hernández J., Sandlund O.T., Sauterleute J.F., Skoglund S., Ugedal O. & Yang H., 2017. Effects of water level regulation in alpine hydropower reservoirs: an ecosystem perspective with a special emphasis on fish. Hydrobiologia 794 (1): 287–301. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hjorth P. & Bengtsson L., 2012. Large dams, statistics and critical review. In: Encyclopedia of Lakes and Reservoirs (L. Bengtsson, R.W. Herschy,R.W. Fairbridge Eds.) pp. 475–479. [Google Scholar]
  • Horký P., Slavík O. & Bartoš L., 2008. A telemetry study on the diurnal distribution and activity of adult pikeperch, Sander lucioperca (L.), in a riverine environment. Hydrobiologia 614 (1): 151. [Google Scholar]
  • Hovel K.A. & Regan H.M., 2008. Using an individual-based model to examine the roles of habitat fragmentation and behavior on predator-prey relationships in seagrass landscapes. Landsc Ecol 23 (1): 75–89. [Google Scholar]
  • Hudon C., Armellin A., Gagnon P. & Patoine A., 2010. Variations in water temperatures and levels in the St. Lawrence River (Québec, Canada) and potential implications for three common fish species. Hydrobiologia 647 (1): 145–161. [Google Scholar]
  • Hudon C., Gagnon P., Amyot J.-P., Létourneau G., Jean M., Plante C., Rioux D. & Deschênes M., 2005. Historical changes in herbaceous wetland distribution induced by hydrological conditions in Lake Saint-Pierre (St. Lawrence River, Quebec, Canada). Hydrobiologia 539 (1): 205–224. [Google Scholar]
  • Huuskonen H., Piironen J., Syväranta J., Eronen R., Biasi C., Kiiskinen P., Kortet R. & Vainikka A., 2019. Diet and movements of pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) in a large oligotrophic lake with an exceptionally high pikeperch yield. Ecol Freshw Fish 28 (4): 533–543. [Google Scholar]
  • Imbrock F., Appenzeller A. & Eckmann R., 2005. Diel and seasonal distribution of perch in Lake Constance: a hydroacoustic study and in situ observations. J Fish Biol 49: 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  • Inskip P.D., 1982. Habitat suitability index models: northern pike. In: FWS/OBS. [Google Scholar]
  • Jacobsen L., Berg S., Baktoft H. & Skov C., 2015. Behavioural strategy of large perch Perca fluviatilis varies between a mesotrophic and a hypereutrophic lake. J Fish Biol 86 (3): 1016–1029. [Google Scholar]
  • Jeppesen E., Mehner T., Winfield I.J., Kangur K., Sarvala J., Gerdeaux D., Rask M., Malmquist H.J., Holmgren K. & Volta P., 2012. Impacts of climate warming on the long-term dynamics of key fish species in 24 European lakes. Hydrobiologia 694 (1): 1–39. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kaczka L.J. & Miranda L.E., 2014. Size of age-0 crappies (Pomoxis spp.) relative to reservoir habitats and water levels. J Freshw Ecol 29 (4): 525–534. [Google Scholar]
  • Kangur K., Park Y.-S., Kangur A., Kangur P. & Lek S., 2007. Patterning long-term changes of fish community in large shallow Lake Peipsi. Ecol Modell 203 (1-2): 34–44. [Google Scholar]
  • Keith P., Persat H., Feunteun E. & Allardi J., 2011. Les Poissons d’eau douce de France. [Google Scholar]
  • Kobler A., Klefoth T., Wolter C., Fredrich F. & Arlinghaus R., 2008. Contrasting pike (Esox lucius L.) movement and habitat choice between summer and winter in a small lake. Hydrobiologia 601 (1): 17. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Liermann C.R., Nilsson C., Robertson J. & Ng R., 2012. Implications of dam obstruction for global freshwater fish diversity. BioScience 62: 539–548. [Google Scholar]
  • Logez M., Roy R., Tissot L. & Argillier C., 2016. Effects of water-level fluctuations on the environmental characteristics and fish-environment relationships in the littoral zone of a reservoir. Fundam Appl Limnol 189 (1): 37–49. [Google Scholar]
  • McAllister D., Craig J., Davidson N., Delany S. & Seddon M., 2001. Biodiversity Impacts of Large Dams. 64 pp. [Google Scholar]
  • Morales J.M. & Ellner S.P., 2002. Scaling up animal movements in heterogeneous landscapes: the importance of behavior. Ecology 83 (8): 2240–2247. [Google Scholar]
  • Nathan R., Getz W.M., Revilla E., Holyoak M., Kadmon R., Saltz D. & Smouse P.E., 2008. A movement ecology paradigm for unifying organismal movement research. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105 (49): 19052–19059. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Overton J., Toner D., Policar T. & Kucharczyk D., 2015. Commercial production: factors for success and limitations in European percid fish culture. 881–890. [Google Scholar]
  • Patterson T.A., Thomas L., Wilcox C., Ovaskainen O. & Matthiopoulos J., 2008. State-space models of individual animal movement. Trends Ecol Evol 23 (2): 87–94. [Google Scholar]
  • Pekcan-Hekim Z., Horppila J., Nurminen L. & Niemistö J., 2005. Diel changes in habitat preference and diet of perch (Perca fluviatilis), roach (Rutilus rutilus) and white bream (Abramis björkna). Archiv für Hydrobiologie Special Issues Advances in Limnology, 59: 173–187. [Google Scholar]
  • Pierce C.L., Rasmussen J.B. & Leggett W.C., 1994. Littoral fish communities in southern quebec lakes: relationships with limnological and prey resource variables. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 51 (5): 1128–1138. [Google Scholar]
  • Pierce R.B., 2012. Northern pike: ecology, conservation, and management history. Environ Hist 18 (3): 650–651. [Google Scholar]
  • Plichard L., Forcellini M., Le Coarer Y., Capra H., Carrel G., Ecochard R. & Lamouroux N., 2020. Predictive models of fish microhabitat selection in multiple sites accounting for abundance overdispersion. River Res Appl 36 (7):1056- 1075 [Google Scholar]
  • Poulet N., Lek S. & Argillier C., 2005. Pikeperch habitat use within a canal network in spring. J Fish Biol 67 (5): 1460–1474. [Google Scholar]
  • Prchalová M., Kubečka J., Cech M.F., Drastík J.V., Hohausova E.M., Peterka J.J.R., Tuser M.M. & Vasek M., 2009. The effect of depth, distance from dam and habitat on spatial distribution of fish in an artificial reservoir. Ecol Freshw Fish 18: 247–260. [Google Scholar]
  • Prchalová M., Kubečka J., Vašek M., Peterka J., Sedá J., Jůza T., Říha M., Jarolím O., Tušer M., Kratochvíl M., Čech M., Draštík V., Frouzová J. & Hohausová E., 2008. Distribution patterns of fishes in a canyon-shaped reservoir. J Fish Biol 73 (1): 54–78. [Google Scholar]
  • Radinger J., Matern S., Klefoth T., Wolter C., Feldhege F., Monk C.T. & Arlinghaus R., 2023. Ecosystem-based management outperforms species-focused stocking for enhancing fish populations. Science 379 (6635): 946–951. [Google Scholar]
  • Railsback S.F., Lamberson R.H., Harvey B.C. & Duffy W.E., 1999. Movement rules for individual-based models of stream fish. Ecol Modell 123 (2): 73–89. [Google Scholar]
  • Rehage J.S., Blanchard J.R., Boucek R.E., Lorenz J.J. & Robinson M., 2016. Knocking back invasions: variable resistance and resilience to multiple cold spells in native vs. nonnative fishes. Ecosphere 7 (6): e01268. [Google Scholar]
  • Říha M., Rabaneda-Bueno R., Jarić I., Souza A.T., Vejřík L., Draštík V., Blabolil P., Holubová M., Jůza T., Gjelland K.Ø., Rychtecký P., Sajdlová Z., Kočvara L., Tušer M., Prchalová M., Seďa J. & Peterka J., 2022. Seasonal habitat use of three predatory fishes in a freshwater ecosystem. Hydrobiologia 849 (15): 3351–3371. [Google Scholar]
  • Rosenfeld J.S., 2017. Developing flow-ecology relationships: implications of nonlinear biological responses for water management. Freshw Biol 62 (8): 1305–1324. [Google Scholar]
  • Roy R., 2014. Distribution spatiale et activité des poissons en milieu lacustre : impacts des facteurs environnementaux à partir d’une approche multi-échelle. Application à la retenue des Bariousses. Thèse de doctorat, Aix Marseille université. 224 pp. [Google Scholar]
  • Roy R., Beguin J., Argillier C., Tissot L., Smith F., Smedbol S. & De Oliveira E., 2014. Testing the VEMCO Positioning System: spatial distribution of the probability of location and the positioning error in a reservoir. Anim Biotelemetry 2 (1): 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  • Roy R., Tissot L. & Argillier C., 2021. Environmental drivers of fish spatial distribution and activity in a reservoir with water level fluctuations. Hydroécol Appl 21: 25–46. [Google Scholar]
  • Schmieder K., 2004. European lake shores in danger − concepts for a sustainable development. Limnologica 34: 3–14. [Google Scholar]
  • Schulze T., Baade U., Dörner H., Eckmann R., Haertel-Borer S.S., Hölker F. & Mehner T., 2006. Response of the residential piscivorous fish community to introduction of a new predator type in a mesotrophic lake. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 63 (10): 2202–2212. [Google Scholar]
  • Skov C. & Koed A., 2004. Habitat use of 0+ year pike in experimental ponds in relation to cannibalism, zooplankton, water transparency and habitat complexity. J Fish Biol 64: 448–459. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Skov C. & Nilsson A., 2018. Biology and Ecology of Pike. CRC Press, 410 pp. [Google Scholar]
  • Strayer D.L. & Findlay S.E.G., 2010. Ecology of Freshwater Shore Zones. Aquat Sci 72 (2): 127–163. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Świerzowski A., Godlewska M. & Półtorak T., 2000. The relationship between the spatial distribution of fish, zooplankton and other environmental parameters in the Solina reservoir, Poland. Aquat Living Resour 13 (5): 373–377. [Google Scholar]
  • Thorpe J.E., 1977. Morphology, physiology, behavior and ecology of Perca flluviatilis and P. flavescens Mitchill. J Fish Board Can 34: 1504–1514. [Google Scholar]
  • Van Winkle W., Jager Y. & Holcomb B., 1998. An individual-based model for sympatric populations of brown and rainbow trout for instream flow assessment: model description and calibration. Ecol Modell 10: 175–207. [Google Scholar]
  • Vanderbosch D. & Galatowitsch S., 2010. An Assessment of urban lakeshore restorations in minnesota. Ecol Restor 28: 71–80. [Google Scholar]
  • Vašek M., Kubečka J., Matěna J. & Seďa J., 2006. Distribution and diet of 0+ Fish within a Canyon-Shaped European Reservoir in Late Summer. Int Rev Hydrobiol 91 (2): 178–194. [Google Scholar]
  • Vašek M., Prchalová M., Říha M., Blabolil P., Čech M., Draštík V., Frouzová J., Jůza T., Kratochvíl M., Muška M., Peterka J., Sajdlová Z., Šmejkal M., Tušer M., Vejřík L., Znachor P., Mrkvička T., Seďa J. & Kubečka J., 2016. Fish community response to the longitudinal environmental gradient in Czech deep-valley reservoirs: implications for ecological monitoring and management. Ecol Indic 63: 219–230. [Google Scholar]
  • Vehanen T. & Lahti M., 2003. Movements and habitat use by pikeperch (Stizostedion lucioperca (L.)) in a hydropeaking reservoir. Ecol Freshw Fish 12 (3): 203–215. [Google Scholar]
  • Westrelin S., Cucherousset J., Roy R., Tissot L., Santoul F. & Argillier C., 2021. Habitat partitioning among three predatory fish in a temperate reservoir. Ecol Freshw Fish 31 (1): 129–142. [Google Scholar]
  • Westrelin S., Roy R., Tissot-Rey L., Bergès L. & Argillier C., 2018. Habitat use and preference of adult perch (Perca fluviatilis L.) in a deep reservoir: variations with seasons, water levels and individuals. Hydrobiologia 809 (1): 121–139. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wetzel R.G., 1990. Reservoir ecosystems: conclusions and speculations. In: Reservoir limnology: ecological perspective (K.W. Thornton, B.L. Kimmel, F.E. Payne Eds.) 11 pp. [Google Scholar]
  • Wu H., Chen J., Xu J., Zeng G., Sang L., Liu Q., Yin Z., Dai J., Yin D., Liang J. & Ye S., 2019. Effects of dam construction on biodiversity: a review. J Clean Prod 221: 480–489. [Google Scholar]
  • Zohary T. & Gasith A., 2014. The littoral zone. In: Lake Kinneret: Ecology and Management (T. Zohary, A. Sukenik, T. Berman, A. Nishri Eds.) pp. 517–532. [Google Scholar]
  • Zohary T. & Ostrovsky I., 2011. Ecological impacts of excessive water level fluctuations in stratified freshwater lakes. Inland Waters 1: 47–59. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.