Open Access
Issue
Hydroécol. Appl.
Volume 17, 2010
Page(s) 99 - 110
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/hydro/2010003
Published online 14 April 2011
  • Anneville O., Ginot V., Druart J.C. & Angeli N., 2002. Long-term study (1974-1998) of seasonal changes in the phytoplankton in Lake Geneva : a multi-table approach. Journal of Plankton Research 24 : 993-1007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Barbe J., Lafont M., Mouthon J. & Philippe M., 2003. Protocole actualisé de la diagnose rapide des plans d’eau. Rapport CEMAGREF, Lyon, 24 pp. [Google Scholar]
  • De Bortoli J. & Argillier C., 2008. Définition des conditions de référence et des li-mites des classes d’état sur la base d’une approche pressions/impacts - Plans d’eau - Paramètre chlorophylle-a. Rapport CEMAGREF, Aix en Provence, 51 pp. [Google Scholar]
  • Garnier J., Billen G., Sanchez N. & Leporcq B. 2000. Ecological functioning of a large reservoir in the upstream basin of the river Seine (Marne reservoir, France). Regulated River 16 : 51-71. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Garnier J., Némery J., Billen G. & Théry S., 2005. Nutrient dynamics and control of eutrophication in the Marne River system : modelling the role of exchangeable phosphorus. J. Hydrol. 304 : 397-412. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jacquet S., Paolini G., Perney P., Lazzaorotto J. & Girel C., 2010. Long-term evolution (1981-2008) of key limnological parameters of Lake Bourget (France). En préparation [Google Scholar]
  • Lenoir A. & Coste M., 1996. Development of a practical diatom index of overall water quality applicable to the french national water board network. Dans : Proceedings of Use of Algae for Monitoring Rivers. Whitton, B.A. et Rott, E. (eds). Institut de Botanique, Université d’Innsbruck. 2 : 29-43. [Google Scholar]
  • Lorenzen C.J., 1967. Determination of chlorophyll and pheopigments: spectrophotometric equations. Limnology and Oceanography 12 : 343-346. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Martin C., 2001. Suivi écologique des lacs-réservoirs de Champagne : expertise de l’étang de la Dame. Rapport CIA, 30 pp. [Google Scholar]
  • Reynolds C.S., Huszar V., Kruk C., Naselli-Flores L., & Melo S. 2002. Towards a functional classification of the freshwater phytoplankton. Journal of Plankton Research 24 : 417-428. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rolland A., Bertrand F., Maumy M. & Jacquet S., 2009. Assessing phytoplankton structure and spatio-temporal dynamics in a freshwater ecosystem using a powerful multiway statistical analysis. Water Research 43 : 3155-3168. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Solheim A.L., 2005. Reference conditions of European lakes. Indicators and methods for the Water Framework Directive Assessment of Reference conditions. Version 5. REBECCA Working Group, 105 pp. [Google Scholar]
  • Utermöhl H., 1958. Zur Vervollkommnung der quantitativen Phytoplankton-methodik. Mitteilungen der Internationale Vereinigung fur Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie 9 : 1-38. [Google Scholar]
  • Vollenweider R.A. & Kerekes J., 1982. Eutrophication of waters. Monitoring, assessment and control. Programme de coopération sur le suivi des eaux intérieures. OCDE, Paris. 154 pp. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.