Open Access
Issue
Hydroécol. Appl.
Volume 19, 2016
Page(s) 197 - 216
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/hydro/2015009
Published online 15 January 2016
  • American Public Health Association. APHA, 1995. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association, American Water Works association, Water Environment Federation, Washington.
  • Araujo H.M.P., Nascimento-Vieira D.A., Neumann-Leitão S., Schwamborn R., Lucas A.P.O. & Alves J.P.H., 2008. Zooplankton community dynamics in relation to the seasonal cycle and nutrient inputs in an urban tropical estuary in Brazil. Brazil. J. Biol. 68(4) : 751-762. [CrossRef]
  • Arcifa M.S., 1984. Zooplankton composition of ten reservoirs in southern Brazil. Hydrobiol. 113(1) : 137-145. [CrossRef]
  • Bernot R.J., Dodds W.K., Quist M.C. & Guy C.S., 2004. Spatial and temporal variability of zooplankton in a great plains reservoir. Hydrobiol. 525(1-3) : 101-112. [CrossRef]
  • Bini L.M., Tundisi J.G., Matsumura-Tundisi T. & Matheus C.E., 1997. Spatial variation of zooplankton groups in a tropical reservoir (Broa Reservoir, São Paulo State-Brazil). Hydrobiol. 357 : 89-98. [CrossRef]
  • Bonecker C.C., Nagae M.U., Bletller M.C.M., Velho L.F.M. & Lansac-Tôha F.A., 2007. Zooplantkon biomass in tropical reservoirs in southern Brazil. Hydrobiol. 579 : 115-123. [CrossRef]
  • Chanudet V., Fabre V. & Van Der Kaaij T., 2012. Application of a three-dimentional model to the Nam Theun 2 Reservoir (Lao PDR). J. Great Lakes Res. 38 : 260-269. [CrossRef]
  • Chanudet V., Guédant P., Rode W., Guérin F., Serça D., Deshmukh C. & Descloux S. Evolution of the physico-chemical water quality in the Nam Theun 2 Reservoir for the first 5 years after impoundment. Hydroécol. Appl. 19 (same issue).
  • Cottet M., Descloux S., Guedant P., Cerdan P. & Vigouroux R. Fish Population dynamic in the newly impounded Nam Theun 2 Reservoir (Lao PDR). Hydroécol. Appl. 19 (same issue).
  • Descloux S., Chanudet V., Poilvé H. & Grégoire A., 2011. Co-assessment of biomass and soil organic carbon stocks in a future reservoir area located in Southeast Asia. Environ. Monit. Assess.173 : 723-741. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Descloux S., Guédant P., Phommachanh D. & Luthi R., 2014. Main features of the Nam Theun 2 hydroelectric project (Lao PDR) and the associated environmental monitoring programme. Hydroécol. Appl. 19 (same issue).
  • Development Core Team, 2011 R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, http://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 12 Jan 2011.
  • Dumont H.J., Van de Velde I. & Dumont S., 1975. The dry weight estimate of biomass in a selection of Cladocera, Copepoda and Rotifera from the plankton, periphyton and benthos of continental waters. Oecologia 19 : 75-97. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Dussart B.H., Fernando C.H., Matsumura-Tundisi T. & Shiel R.J., 1984. A review of systematics, distribution and ecology of tropical freshwater zooplankton. In Tropical Zooplankton (pp. 77-91). Springer Netherlands.
  • Espíndola E.L.G., Matsumura-Tundisi T., Rietzler A.C. & Tundisi J.G., 2000. Spatial heterogeneity of the Tucuruí reservoir (State of Pará, Amazonia, Brazil) and the distribution of zooplanktonic species. Revista Brasileira de Biologia 60(2) : 179-194. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Fernando C.H., 2002. Guide to tropical freshwater zooplankton: identification, ecology and impact on fisheries. In Guide to tropical freshwater zooplankton: identification, ecology and impact on fisheries. Backhuys.
  • Fetahi T., Mengistou S. & Schagerl M., 2011. Zooplankton community structure and ecology of the tropical-highland Lake Hayq, Ethiopia. Limnol. 41 : 389-397. [CrossRef]
  • Frontier S., 1972. Calcul de l’erreur sur un comptage de zooplancton. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 8 : 121-132. [CrossRef]
  • Gliwicz Z.M., 1994. Relative significance of direct and indirect effects of predation by planktivorous fish on zooplankton. Hydrobiol. 272(1-3) : 201-210. [CrossRef]
  • González E.J., Matsumura-Tundisi T. & Tundisi J.G., 2008. Size and dry weight of main zooplankton species in Bariri reservoir (SP, Brazil). Brazilian J. Biology 68(1) : 69-75. [CrossRef]
  • Hairston Jr N.G & Fussman G.F., 2002. Lake Ecosystems. Encyclopodia of Life Science. Mcmillan Publishers Ltd, Nature Publishing Group.
  • Hart R.C., 1990. Zooplankton distribution in relation to turbidity and related environmental gradients in a large subtropical reservoir: patterns and implications. Freshwater Biol. 24(2) : 241-263. [CrossRef]
  • Havens K.E., 2002. Zooplankton structure and potential food web interactions in the plankton of a subtropical chain-of-lakes. The Scientific World Journal 2 : 926-942. [CrossRef]
  • Horeau V., Richard S., Vigouroux R., Guillemet L. & Cerdan P., 2005. Variabilités spatiales et temporelles de la qualité physico-chimique et des invertébrés pélagiques des eaux de la retenue hydroélectrique de Petit Saut (Guyane française). J. Water Science 18 : 109-126.
  • Lansac-Tôha F.A, Bini L.M., Velho L.F.M., Bonecker C.C., Takahashi E.M. & Vieira L.C.G., 2008. Temporal coherence of zooplankton abundance in a tropical reservoir. Hydrobiol. 614 : 387-399. [CrossRef]
  • Mageed A.A.A., & Heikal M.T., 2006. Factors affecting seasonal patterns in epilimnion zooplankton community in one of the largest man-made lakes in Africa (Lake Nasser, Egypt). Limnologica - Ecology and Management of Inland Waters 36(2) : 91-97. [CrossRef]
  • Martinet M., Guédant P. & Descloux S. Phytoplankton community and trophic status assessment of a newly impounded sub-tropical reservoir: case study of the Nam-Theun 2 Reservoir (Lao PDR, South-East Asia). Hydroécol. Appl. 19 (same issue).
  • Marzolf G.R., 1990. Reservoirs as environments for zooplankton. In: Reservoir Limnology: Ecological Perspectives. John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 195-208.
  • Matsumura-Tundisi T. & Tundisi J.G., 1976. Plankton studies in a lacustrine environment. Oecologia 25(3) : 265-270. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Michaloudi E., 2005. Dry weights of the zooplankton of Lake Mikri Prespa (Macedonia, Greece). Belgian Journal of Zoology 135(2) : 223-227.
  • MRC, 2010. State of the Basin Report 2010. Mekong River Commission, Vientiane, Lao PDR,123 p.
  • Nogueira M.G., 2001. Zooplankton composition, dominance and abundance as indicators of environmental compartmentalization in Jurumirim Reservoir (Paranapanema River), São Paulo, Brazil. Hydrobiol. 455(1-3) : 1-18. [CrossRef]
  • Pinto-Coelho R., Pinel-Alloul B., Méthot G. & Havens K.E., 2005. Crustacean zooplankton in lakes and reservoirs of temperate and tropical regions: variation with trophic status. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 62 : 348-361. [CrossRef]
  • Rennella A.M. & Quirós R., 2006. The effects of hydrology on plankton biomass in shallow lakes of the Pampa Plain. Hydrobiol. 556(1) : 181-191. [CrossRef]
  • Saunders III J.F., & Lewis Jr W.M., 1988. Zooplankton abundance and transport in a tropical white-water river. Hydrobiol. 162(2) : 147-155. [CrossRef]
  • Schulz K.L. & Sterner R.W., 1999. Phytoplankton phosphorus limitation and food quality for Bosmina. Limnol. Oceanogr. 44 : 1549-1556. [CrossRef]
  • Seda J. & Devetter M., 2000. Zooplankton community structure along a trophic gradient in a canyon-shaped dam reservoir. J. Plankton Res. 22(10) : 1829-1840. [CrossRef]
  • Sousa F.D.R., Elmoor-Loureiro L.M.A., Medonça-Galvaõ L. & Pujol-Luz J.R., 2014. Evaluation of a new sampling method for assessing Cladocera richness (Crustacea, Branchiopoda) in macrophyte-rich wetlands. Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim. 50 : 143-153. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  • Starling F.D.R., 2000. Comparative study of the zooplankton composition of six lacustrine ecosystems in Central Brazil during the dry season. Rev. Brasileira de Biologia, 60(1) : 101-111. [CrossRef]
  • Uku J.N., & Mavuti K.M., 1994. Comparative limnology, species diversity and biomass relationship of zooplankton and phytoplankton in five freshwater lakes in Kenya. Hydrobiol. 272(1-3) : 251-258. [CrossRef]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.