EDP Sciences logo
rechercher
Menu
Accueil Tous les numéros Volume 20 (Mai 2018) Hydroécol. Appl., 20 (2018) 1-27 Références
Open Access
Numéro
Hydroécol. Appl.
Volume 20, Mai 2018
Page(s) 1 - 27
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/hydro/2016004
Publié en ligne 27 septembre 2016
  • Acreman M.C. & Ferguson A., 2010. Environmental flows and European Water Framework Directive. Freshw. Biol. 55: 32–48. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Acreman M., Arthington A.H., Colloff M.J., Couch C., Crossman N.D., Dyer F., Overton I., Pollino C.A., Stewardson M.J. & Young W., 2014a. Environmental flows for natural, hybrid, and novel riverine ecosystems in a changing world. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 12: 466–473. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Acreman M.C., Overton I.C., King J., Wood P., Cowx I.G., Dunbar M.J., Kendy E. & Young W., 2014b. The changing role of ecohydrological science in guiding environmental flows. Hydrological Sciences Journal 59: 433–450. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Andréassian V., Bergstrom S., Chahinian N., Duan Q., Gusev Y.M., Littlewood I., Mathevet T., Michel C., Montanari A., Moretti G., Moussa R., Nasonova O.N., O’Connor K.M., Paquet E., Perrin, C., Rousseau A., Schaake J., Wagener T. & Xie Z., 2006. Catalogue of the models used in MOPEX 2004/2005. IAHS Publication 307: 41–93. [Google Scholar]
  • Baran P., Delacoste M., Dauba F., Lascaux J.M. & Belaud A., 1995. Effects of reduced flow on brown trout populations downstream dams in French Pyrenees. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 10: 347–361. [Google Scholar]
  • Baran P., Longuevergne L., Ombredane D., Dufour S. & Dupont N., 2015. Débit Minimum Biologique (DMB) et gestion quantitative de la ressource en eau. Centre de Ressources et d’Expertise Scientifique sur l’Eau en Bretagne : 124 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Bernhardt E.S., Palmer M.A., Allan J.D., Alexander G., Barnas K., Brooks S., Carr J., Clayton S., Dahm C., Follstad- Shah J., Galat D., Gloss S., Goodwin P., Hart D., Hassett B., Jenkinson R., Katz S., Kondolf G.M., Lake P.S., Lave R., Meyer J.L., O’donnell T.K., Pagano L., Powell B. & Sudduth E., 2005. Synthesizing U.S. river restoration efforts. Science 308: 636–637. [Google Scholar]
  • Bloschl G., Sivapalan M., Wagener T., Viglione A. & Savenije H., 2013. Runoff prediction in ungauged basins. Synthesis across processes, places and scales. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK: 465 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Bovee K.D., 1982. A Guide to Stream Habitat Analysis Using the Instream Flow Incremental Methodology. Instream Flow Information Paper 12. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA: 248 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Bradford M.J., Higgins P.S., Korman J. & Sneep J., 2011. Test of an environmental flow release in a British Columbia river: does more water mean more fish? Freshwater Biology 56 : 2119–2134. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Capra H., McNeil E., Bouillon M.-C., Pella H., Alfaro C., (2011) Intérêt d’un modèle hydrodynamique en deux dimensions pour interpréter le comportement des poissons dans les grands cours d’eau. La Houille Blanche 6 : 28–33. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Capra H., Sabaton C., Gouraud V., Souchon Y. & Lim P., 2003. A population dynamics model and habitat simulation as a tool to predict brown trout demography in natural and bypassed stream reaches. River Research and Applications 19 : 551568. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Carlisle D.M., Wolock D.M. & Meador M.R. 2011. Alteration of streamflow magnitudes and potential ecological consequences: a multiregional assessment. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 9: 264–270. [Google Scholar]
  • Catalogne C., Sauquet E. & Lang M., 2014. Valorisation des données de jaugeages épisodiques pour l’estimation du débit de référence d’étiage QMNA5. La Houille Blanche 4: 78–87. [Google Scholar]
  • Cattanéo F., 2005a. Does hydrology constrain the structure of fish assemblages in French streams? Local scale analysis. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 164: 345365. [Google Scholar]
  • Cattanéo F., 2005b. Does hydrology constrain the structure of fish assemblages in French streams? Regional scale analysis. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 164: 367385. [Google Scholar]
  • Courret D., 2015. Problématique des impacts de la gestion par éclusées des aménagements hydroélectriques sur les populations de poissons – Caractérisation des régimes d’éclusées et du niveau de perturbation hydrologique, et réflexions sur les mesures de mitigation. Thèse de Doctorat. INP-Toulouse, France : 218 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Dunbar M.J., Alfredsen K. & Harby A., 2012. Hydraulic-habitat modelling for setting environmental river flow needs for salmonids. Fisheries Ecology and Management 19 : 500–517. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Environment Agency., 2013. Managing water abstraction. Environment Agency, Bristol, UK: 29 p. [Google Scholar]
  • European Commission., 2015. Ecological flows in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive. CIS Guidance Document No. 31. Technical Report - 2015-086: 108 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Fahrner G., 2010. Typologie des impacts potentiels des ouvrages hydroélectriques sur les populations de truite situées en aval. Thèse de Doctorat. Agro Paris Tech, Paris : 168 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Floury C., Navarro L., Stroffek S., Dupré la Tour J. & Lamouroux N., 2013. Mieux gérer les prélèvements d’eau : l’évaluation préalable des débits biologiques dans les cours d’eau. Note du Secrétariat Technique du Sdage. Agence de l’Eau Rhône-Méditerrannée-Corse, Irstea, Onema : 18 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Ghanem A.H., Steffler P.M., Hicks F.E. & Katopodis C., 1996. Two dimensional finite element flow modeling of physical fish habitat. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 12: 185–200. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gido K.B., Propst D.L., Olden J.D. & Bestgen K.R., 2013. Multidecadal responses of native and introduced fishes to natural and altered flow regimes in the American Southwest. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 70: 554–564. [Google Scholar]
  • Gillespie B.R., Desmet S., Kay P., Tillotson M.R. & Brown L.E., 2015. A critical analysis of regulated river ecosystem responses to managed environmental flows from reservoirs. Freshwater Biology 60: 410–425. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ginot V., 1998. Logiciel EVHA. Evaluation de l’habitat physique des poissons en rivière (version 2.0). Cemagref Lyon BEA/LHQ et Ministère de l’aménagement du Territoire et de l’Environnement, Direction de l’Eau, Paris : 109 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Girard V., Lamouroux N. & Mons R., 2014a. Modeling point velocity and depth statistical distributions in steep tropical and alpine stream reaches. Water Resources Research 50: 427–439. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Girard V., Monti D., Valade P., Lamouroux N., Mallet J.P. & Grondin H., 2014b. Hydraulic preferences of shrimps and fishes in tropical insular rivers. River Research and Applications 30: 766779. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gouraud V., Capra H., Sabaton C., Tissot L., Vandewalle F., Lim P. & Souchon Y., 2008. Long-term simulations of the dynamics of trout populations on river reaches bypassed by hydroelectric installations analysis of the impact of differents hydrological scénarios. River Research and Applications 24: 1185–1205. [Google Scholar]
  • Hauer C., Unfer G., Holzapfel P., Haimann M. & Habersack H., 2014. Impact of channel bar form and grain size variabilityon estimated stranding risk of juvenile brown trout during hydropeaking. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 39: 1622–1641. [Google Scholar]
  • Jowett I.G. & Biggs B.J.F., 2006. Flow regime requirements and the biological effectiveness of habitat-based minimum flow assessments for six rivers. International Journal of River Basin Management 4: 179–189. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kendy E., Apse C. & Blann K., 2012. A practical guide to environmental flows for policy and planning, with nine case studies from the United States. The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA (www.nature.org): 74 p. [Google Scholar]
  • King J., Brown C. & Sabet H., (2003) A scenario-based holistic approach to environmental flow assessments for rivers. River Research and Applications 19: 619–639. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lamouroux N., 2008. Hydraulic geometry of stream reaches and ecological implications. In Gravel Bed Rivers 6: From Process Understanding to the Restoration of Mountain Rivers. H. Habersack, H. Piégay and M. Rinaldi, ed. Developments in Earth Surface Processes 11: 661–675. [Google Scholar]
  • Lamouroux N. & Capra H., 2002. Simple predictions of instream habitat model outputs for target fish populations. Freshwater Biology 47: 1543–1556. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lamouroux N. & Souchon Y., 2002. Simple predictions of instream habitat model outputs for fish habitat guilds in large streams. Freshwater Biology 47: 15311542. [Google Scholar]
  • Lamouroux N. & Olivier J.-M., 2015. Testing predictions of changes in fish abundance and community structure after flow restoration in four reaches of a large river (French Rhône). Freshwater Biology 60: 1118–1130. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lamouroux N., Capra H., Pouilly M. & Sou- chon Y., 1999. Fish habitat preferences at the local scale in large streams of southern France. Freshwater Biology 42: 673–687. [Google Scholar]
  • Lamouroux N., Mérigoux S., Capra H., Dolédec S., Jowett I.G. & Statzner B., 2010. The generality of abundance-environment relationships in microhabitats: a comment on Lancaster and Downes (2009). River Research and Applications 26: 915–920. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lamouroux N., Mérigoux S., Dolédec S. & Snelder T.H., 2013. Transferability of hydraulic preference models for aquatic macroinvertebrates. River Research and Applications 29: 933–937. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lamouroux N., Pella H., Snelder T.H., Sauquet E., Lejot J. & Shankar U., 2014. Uncertainty models for estimates of physical characteristics of river segments over large areas. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 50: 1–13. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lamouroux N., Gore J.A., Lepori F. & Statzner B., 2015. The ecological restoration of large rivers needs science- based, predictive tools meeting public expectations: an overview of the Rhône project. Freshwater Biology 60: 10691084. [Google Scholar]
  • Lancaster J. & Downes B.J., 2010. Linking the hydraulic world of individual organisms to ecological processes: putting ecology into ecohydraulics. River Research and Applications 26: 385–403. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lang Delus C., 2011. Les étiages : définitions hydrologique, statistique et seuils réglementaires. Cybergeo : European Journal of Geography [www.cyber-geo.revues.org/24827], Environnement, Nature, Paysage, document 571. DOI: 10.4000/cybergeo.24827. [Google Scholar]
  • Linnansaari T., Monk W.A., Baird D.J. & Curry R.A., 2013. Review of approaches and methods to assess Environmental Flows across Canada and internationally. Research Document 2012/039. Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat, Fisheries and Oceans, Canada: 75 p. [Google Scholar]
  • McManamay R.A., Orth D.J., Dolloff C.A. & Mathews D.C., 2013. Application of the ELOHA framework to regulated rivers in the upper Tennessee river basin: a case study. Environmental Management 51: 1210–1235. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mérigoux S., Forcellini M., Dessaix J., Fruget J.-F., Lamouroux N. & Statzner B., 2015. Testing predictions of changes in benthic invertebrate abundance and community structure after flow restoration in a large river (French Rhône). Freshwater Biology 60: 1104–1117. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Miguel C., Lamouroux N., Pella H., Labarthe B., Flipo N., Akopian M. & Belliard J., 2016. Altération d’habitat hydraulique à l’échelle des bassins versants: impacts des prélèvements en nappe du bassin Seine-Normandie. La Houille Blanche 3: 65–74. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Morandi B., Piégay H., Lamouroux N. & Vaudor L., 2014. How is success or failure in river restoration projects evaluated? Feedback from French restoration projects. Journal of Environmental Management 137: 178–188. [Google Scholar]
  • Murchie K.J., Hair K.P.E., Pullen A.C.E., Redpath A.T.D., Stephens A.H.R. & Cooke S.J., 2008. Fish response to modified flow regimes in regulated rivers: research methods, effects and opportunities. River Research and Applications 24: 197–217. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Olden J.D., Konrad C.P., Melis T.S., Kennard M.J., Freeman M.C., Mims M.C., Bray E., Gido K., Hemphill N., Lytle D., McMullen L., Pyron M., Robinson C., Schmidt J. & Williams J., 2014. Are large-scale flow experiments informing the science and management of freshwater ecosystems? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 12: 176–185. [Google Scholar]
  • Pahl-Wostl C., Arthington A.H., Bogardi J., Bunn S.E., Hoff H., Lebel L., Nikitina E., Palmer M., Poff N. L., Richards K., Schluter M., Schulze R., St-Hilaire A., Tharme R., Tockner K. & Tsegai D., 2013. Environmental flows and water governance: managing sustainable water uses. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 5: 341–351. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pella H., Lejot J., Lamouroux N. & Snelder T., 2012. Le réseau hydrographique théorique (RHT) français et ses attributs environnementaux. Géomorphologie : Relief, Processus, Environnement 3: 317–336. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pelte T., Navarro L., Stroffek, Dupré la Tour J., Datry T., Langon M. Martinez P.-J. & Delhaye H., 2014. Les cours d’eau intermittents. Eléments de connaissance et premières préconisations. Note du Secrétariat Technique du Sdage. Agence de l’Eau Rhône-Méditerrannée-Corse, Irstea, Onema, Dréal Rhône-Alpes. Lyon, France : 16 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Poff N.L. & Matthews J.H., 2013. Environmental flows in the Anthropocene: Past progress and future prospects. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 5: 1–19. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Poff N.L. & Zimmerman J.K.H., 2010. Ecological responses to altered flow regimes: a literature review to inform the science and management of environmental flows. Freshwater Biology 55: 194–205. [Google Scholar]
  • Poff N.L., Allan J.D., Bain M.B., Karr J.R., Prestegaard K.L., Richter B.D., Sparks R., & Stromberg J., 1997. The natural flow regime. A paradigm for river conservation and restoration. BioScience 47: 769–784. [Google Scholar]
  • Poff N.L., Richter B.D., Arthington A.H., Bunn S.E., Naiman R.J., Kendy E., Acreman M.C., Apse C., Bledsoe B.P., Freeman M.C., Henriksen J., Jacobson R.B., Kennen J.G., Merritt D.M., O’Keeffe J.H., Olden J.D., Rogers K., Tharme R.E. & Warner A., 2010. The ecological limits of hydrologic alteration (ELOHA): a new framework for developing regional environmental flow standards. Freshwater Biology 55: 147–170. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • République Française., 2011. Circulaire du 5 Juillet 2011 relative à l’application de l’article L. 2014-18 du code de l’environnement sur les débits réservés à maintenir en cours d’eau. Ministère de l’Ecologie, du Développement Durable, des Transports et du Logement : 5 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Richter B.D., 2010. Re-thinking environmental flows: from allocations and reserves to sustainability boundaries. River Research and Applications 26: 1052–1063. [Google Scholar]
  • Richter B.D., Baumgartner J.V., Powell J. & Braun D.P., 1996. A method for assessing hydrologic alteration within ecosystems. Conservation Biology 10: 11631174. [Google Scholar]
  • Richter B.D., Baumgartner J.V., Wigington R. & Braun D.P., 1997. How much water does a river need? Freshwater Biology 37: 231–249. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Riffard M., Andréassian V., Nicolle P. & Peschard J., 2011. Combinaison multi- modèle et cartographie de consensus du débit de référence d’étiage et du débit moyen à l’échelle de la France. Rapport technique. Onema & Irstea, Vincennes, France : 37 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Rinaldi M., Belletti B., Van de Bund W., Bertoldi W., Gurnell A., Buijse T. & Mosselman E., 2013. Review on ecohydromorphological methods. In Deliverables of the EU FP7 REFORM project. N. Friberg, M. O’Hare and A. Poulsen ed. (www.reformrivers.eu) : 202 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Rolls R.J., Leigh C. & Sheldon F., 2012. Mechanistic effects of low-flow hydrology on riverine ecosystems:ecological principles and consequences of alteration. Freshwater Science 31: 11631186. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sabaton C., Valentin S. & Souchon Y., 1995. La méthode des microhabitats. Protocoles d’application. EDF Direction des Etudes et Recherches et Cemagref : 32 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Sabaton C., Souchon Y., Capra H., Gouraud V., Lascaux J.-M. & Tissot L., 2008. Long-term brown trout populations responses to flow manipulation. River Research and Applications 24: 476505. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Saraeva K. & Hardy T.B., 2009. Prediction of fisheries physical habitat values based on hydraulic geometry and frequency distributions of depth and velocity. International Journal of River Basin Management 7: 31–41. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sauquet E. 2006. Mapping mean annual river discharges: geostatistical developments for incorporating river network dependencies. Journal of Hydrology 331(1–2): 300–314. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sauquet E. & Catalogne C. 2011. Comparison of catchment grouping methods for flow duration curve estimation at ungauged sites in France. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 15: 24212435. [Google Scholar]
  • Shenton W., Bond N.R., Yen J.D.L. & Mac Nally R., 2012. Putting the “Ecology” into environmental flows: ecological dynamics and demographic modelling. Environmental Management 50: 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  • Singh V.P. & Frevert D.K., 2006. Watershed Models. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA: 653 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Snelder T.H. & Lamouroux N., 2010. Covariation of fish assemblages, flow regimes and other habitat factors in French rivers. Freshwater Biology 55: 881–892. [Google Scholar]
  • Snelder T.H., Lamouroux N., Leathwick J.R., Pella H., Sauquet E. & Shankar U., 2015 Predictive mapping of natural flow regimes of France. Journal of Hydrology 373: 57–67. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Snelder T.H., Booker D. & Lamouroux N., 2011. A method to assess and define environmental flow rules for large jurisdictional regions. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 47: 828–840. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Snelder T.H., Datry T., Lamouroux N., Larned S.T., Sauquet E., Pella H. & Catalogne C., 2013. Regionalization of patterns of flow intermittence from gauging station records. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 17: 2685–2699. [Google Scholar]
  • Souchon Y., Lamouroux N., Capra H. & Chandesris A., 2003. La méthodologie Estimhab dans le paysage des méthodes de microhabitat. Note technique, Cemagref Lyon : 9 pp. (http://www.irstea.fr/dynam). [Google Scholar]
  • Souchon Y., Sabaton C., Deibel R., Reiser D., Kershner J., Gard M., Katopodis C., Leonard P., Poff N.L., Miller W.J. & Lamb B.L., 2008. Detecting biological responses to flow management: missed opportunities; future directions. River Research and Applications 24: 506–518. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Statzner B. & Müller R., 1989. Standard hemispheres as indicators of flow characteristics in lotic benthos research. Freshwater Biology 21: 445–459. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tennant D.L., 1976. Instream flow regimens for fish, wildlife, recreation and related environmental resources. Fisheries 1: 6–10. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tharme R.E., 2003. A global perspective on environmental flow assessment: emerging trends in the development and application of environmental flow methodologies for rivers. River Research and Applications 19: 397–441. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Thévenet A., 1998. Intérêt des débris ligneux grossiers pour les poissons dans les grandes rivières. Thèse de doctorat, Université Lyon I, Lyon, France : 111 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Valette L., Piffady J., Chandesris A. & Souchon Y., 2012. SYRAH-CE: description des données et modélisation du risque d’altération hydromorphologique des cours d’eau pour l’état des lieux DCE. Rapport Technique Onema-Irstea : 104 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Vaudor L., Lamouroux N., Olivier J.-M. & Forcellini M., 2015. How sampling influences the statistical power to detect changes in abundance: an application to river restoration. Freshwater Biology 60: 1192–1207. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Webb J.A., De Little S.C., Miller K.A., Stewardson M.J., Rutherfurd I.D., Sharpe A.K., Patulny L. & Poff N.L., 2015. A general approach to predicting ecological responses to environmental flows: making best use of the literature, expert knowledge and monitoring data. River Research and Applications 31: 505–514. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wilding T.K., Bledsoe B., Poff N.L. & Sanderson J., 2014. Predicting habitat response to flow using generalized habitat models for trout in Rocky Mountain streams. River Research and Applications 7: 805–824. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.